<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46761</link>
    <description>Power factor was treated as a relevant element in determining annual capacity under the capacity-based excise scheme, because Section 3A of the Central Excise Act requires assessment by reference to relevant production factors; the rule was read down to permit its consideration rather than exclude it. The earlier Supreme Court ruling cited by the Revenue was held inapplicable because it involved a different statutory claim and did not bar redetermination on the basis of a relevant factor in the original capacity assessment. The impugned determination was quashed and capacity was directed to be redetermined after considering power factor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46761</link>
      <description>Power factor was treated as a relevant element in determining annual capacity under the capacity-based excise scheme, because Section 3A of the Central Excise Act requires assessment by reference to relevant production factors; the rule was read down to permit its consideration rather than exclude it. The earlier Supreme Court ruling cited by the Revenue was held inapplicable because it involved a different statutory claim and did not bar redetermination on the basis of a relevant factor in the original capacity assessment. The impugned determination was quashed and capacity was directed to be redetermined after considering power factor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>