<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46756</link>
    <description>A show cause notice for confiscation of coins alleged to be antiquities was valid where the authorities had sufficient prima facie material, including the archaeologist&#039;s report and the coins&#039; age and historical character; a prior final report under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 was not required before notice under the Customs Act. Quashing of the criminal complaint did not bar confiscation adjudication, because criminal prosecution and confiscation proceedings operate independently under the relevant statutes. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the confiscation proceedings were permitted to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46756</link>
      <description>A show cause notice for confiscation of coins alleged to be antiquities was valid where the authorities had sufficient prima facie material, including the archaeologist&#039;s report and the coins&#039; age and historical character; a prior final report under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 was not required before notice under the Customs Act. Quashing of the criminal complaint did not bar confiscation adjudication, because criminal prosecution and confiscation proceedings operate independently under the relevant statutes. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the confiscation proceedings were permitted to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>