<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46754</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to respond to the demand-cum-show cause notice and allowed the appropriate authority to decide on the liability for interest on duty-exempted goods stored in a customs warehouse within three months. The Court emphasized the importance of statutory authorities adjudicating the matter under the Customs Act to avoid premature interference and directed the petitioner to maintain the bond submitted until resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46754</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to respond to the demand-cum-show cause notice and allowed the appropriate authority to decide on the liability for interest on duty-exempted goods stored in a customs warehouse within three months. The Court emphasized the importance of statutory authorities adjudicating the matter under the Customs Act to avoid premature interference and directed the petitioner to maintain the bond submitted until resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>