<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46736</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) regarding the deposit amount of Rs. 5 crore 80 lacs, finding it just and reasonable in light of the total liability of Rs. 51 crores. The Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the orders and emphasized the necessity of complying with legal procedures and fulfilling obligations as directed by the Tribunal. The appeals were dismissed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to deposit the directed amount within the specified timeframe, leading to the Court&#039;s decision in favor of CEGAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46736</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) regarding the deposit amount of Rs. 5 crore 80 lacs, finding it just and reasonable in light of the total liability of Rs. 51 crores. The Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the orders and emphasized the necessity of complying with legal procedures and fulfilling obligations as directed by the Tribunal. The appeals were dismissed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to deposit the directed amount within the specified timeframe, leading to the Court&#039;s decision in favor of CEGAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>