<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46723</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remitting the case for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need for all appellant&#039;s contentions to be duly considered, directing the Tribunal to hear and dispose of the matter within four months. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and compliance in excise duty cases, ensuring a thorough reconsideration of the case in accordance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46723</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remitting the case for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need for all appellant&#039;s contentions to be duly considered, directing the Tribunal to hear and dispose of the matter within four months. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and compliance in excise duty cases, ensuring a thorough reconsideration of the case in accordance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>