<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46721</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the decision of the Tribunal, dismissing the appeals and stating that the invoiced price alone was not the sole consideration for the sale of concentrate. The court allowed the assessee to raise questions regarding the computation of the royalty amount before the adjudicating authority. The appeals were dismissed without costs, with the above observation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46721</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the decision of the Tribunal, dismissing the appeals and stating that the invoiced price alone was not the sole consideration for the sale of concentrate. The court allowed the assessee to raise questions regarding the computation of the royalty amount before the adjudicating authority. The appeals were dismissed without costs, with the above observation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>