<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 52 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46708</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Department cannot invoke the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act if the manufacturer has revealed information in another proceeding. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 52 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46708</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Department cannot invoke the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act if the manufacturer has revealed information in another proceeding. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>