<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46705</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration as it clarified that orders under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are not appealable to CEGAT. The Court emphasized the importance of understanding the appellate jurisdiction under the Act and the need for adherence to legal provisions when determining the appealability of such orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46705</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration as it clarified that orders under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are not appealable to CEGAT. The Court emphasized the importance of understanding the appellate jurisdiction under the Act and the need for adherence to legal provisions when determining the appealability of such orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>