https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778730 The SC dismissed the appeal and declined to entertain it because the impugned CESTAT order was a remand order. The dispute concerned whether the appellant's processing of ROM manganese ore amounted to manufacture of concentrate and entitlement to Notification No. 63/95-CE; CESTAT found the earlier order non-speaking and remanded the matter for further consideration, leading SC to refuse further intervention. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:33:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778730 The SC dismissed the appeal and declined to entertain it because the impugned CESTAT order was a remand order. The dispute concerned whether the appellant's processing of ROM manganese ore amounted to manufacture of concentrate and entitlement to Notification No. 63/95-CE; CESTAT found the earlier order non-speaking and remanded the matter for further consideration, leading SC to refuse further intervention. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778730