<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778744</link>
    <description>A section 8 company formed for charitable objectives and registered under section 12AA was treated as not carrying on business in the sense contemplated by section 44AB. On that factual basis, the statutory tax audit requirement did not apply, so alleged non-compliance could not support penalty under section 271B. The text states that the penalty was therefore unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778744</link>
      <description>A section 8 company formed for charitable objectives and registered under section 12AA was treated as not carrying on business in the sense contemplated by section 44AB. On that factual basis, the statutory tax audit requirement did not apply, so alleged non-compliance could not support penalty under section 271B. The text states that the penalty was therefore unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>