<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1236 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778747</link>
    <description>ITAT (Kol.) held that where a non-jurisdictional ITO issued the s.143(2) notice and the case was transferred, the jurisdictional ITO who framed assessment without issuing a fresh s.143(2) notice lacked jurisdiction; the assessment is a nullity. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding support in precedent that an assessment framed by the jurisdictional AO without a proper s.143(2) notice is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1236 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778747</link>
      <description>ITAT (Kol.) held that where a non-jurisdictional ITO issued the s.143(2) notice and the case was transferred, the jurisdictional ITO who framed assessment without issuing a fresh s.143(2) notice lacked jurisdiction; the assessment is a nullity. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding support in precedent that an assessment framed by the jurisdictional AO without a proper s.143(2) notice is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>