<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1240 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778751</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A was confined to the amount of actual exempt income where the same approach had already been applied in the assessee&#039;s own earlier year and no distinguishing facts were shown. The Tribunal also accepted the deduction under section 80JJA for the relevant assessment years because the claim had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts and that view had been affirmed in appeal. On both issues, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the relief granted to the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1240 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778751</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A was confined to the amount of actual exempt income where the same approach had already been applied in the assessee&#039;s own earlier year and no distinguishing facts were shown. The Tribunal also accepted the deduction under section 80JJA for the relevant assessment years because the claim had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts and that view had been affirmed in appeal. On both issues, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the relief granted to the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>