<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1242 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778753</link>
    <description>ITAT, Dehradun allowed the appeals and set aside additions made under s.153A. The Tribunal held that a statement recorded u/s 132, without corroborative or seized incriminating material, cannot support income-tax additions; the DVO valuation difference alone was insufficient to establish undisclosed income. In the absence of any other evidentiary material found during search, the additions against the assessee for the assessment years were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1242 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778753</link>
      <description>ITAT, Dehradun allowed the appeals and set aside additions made under s.153A. The Tribunal held that a statement recorded u/s 132, without corroborative or seized incriminating material, cannot support income-tax additions; the DVO valuation difference alone was insufficient to establish undisclosed income. In the absence of any other evidentiary material found during search, the additions against the assessee for the assessment years were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>