<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1256 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778767</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition upholding the HC&#039;s finding that reopening assessment under s.147 by issuing notice beyond four years amounted to mere change of opinion. The Court agreed jurisdictional parameters for reopening were not met, noting no failure by the taxpayer to fully and truly disclose material facts nor circumstances warranting reassessment. The impugned High Court order was left undisturbed and the petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1256 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778767</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition upholding the HC&#039;s finding that reopening assessment under s.147 by issuing notice beyond four years amounted to mere change of opinion. The Court agreed jurisdictional parameters for reopening were not met, noting no failure by the taxpayer to fully and truly disclose material facts nor circumstances warranting reassessment. The impugned High Court order was left undisturbed and the petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>