<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 47 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46693</link>
    <description>The SC held that mere inclusion of an item in the First Schedule to the Tariff Act does not automatically make it liable to excise duty. The court ruled that cinder cannot be subjected to excise duty as it has not undergone any manufacturing process in India. For excise duty liability, goods must be produced or manufactured in India through transformation of raw materials into new products by skillful manipulation. The revenue failed to discharge the burden of proving that cinder underwent manufacturing process. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s contention that cinder is liable to excise duty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 13:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 47 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46693</link>
      <description>The SC held that mere inclusion of an item in the First Schedule to the Tariff Act does not automatically make it liable to excise duty. The court ruled that cinder cannot be subjected to excise duty as it has not undergone any manufacturing process in India. For excise duty liability, goods must be produced or manufactured in India through transformation of raw materials into new products by skillful manipulation. The revenue failed to discharge the burden of proving that cinder underwent manufacturing process. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s contention that cinder is liable to excise duty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>