https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46691 Where a licensing authority split one consolidated imprest entitlement into two instalments and calculated both on the same CIF value and export obligation basis under the original policy, the later instalment remained part of the same original grant. The Court found that subsequent public notices changing replenishment rates could not be applied to that instalment, because the authority had not computed it under the amended policy. The impugned demand based on the later notices was unsustainable, and the show cause notice and licensing orders were quashed. en-us Tue, 02 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:02:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46691 Where a licensing authority split one consolidated imprest entitlement into two instalments and calculated both on the same CIF value and export obligation basis under the original policy, the later instalment remained part of the same original grant. The Court found that subsequent public notices changing replenishment rates could not be applied to that instalment, because the authority had not computed it under the amended policy. The impugned demand based on the later notices was unsustainable, and the show cause notice and licensing orders were quashed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46691