<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46685</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer and packer of instant coffee, regarding the claim for interest on refunds under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the Respondents&#039; rejection of the interest claim, the Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s statutory right to interest on delayed payment. The Court intervened, directing the Respondents to pay interest at 5% from the date of the application, citing the petitioner&#039;s statutory entitlement and legal precedents. The Court clarified that the non-adjudicatory nature of the order Annexure-N made it non-appealable and instructed the Respondents to settle the interest within three months without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:53:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46685</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer and packer of instant coffee, regarding the claim for interest on refunds under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the Respondents&#039; rejection of the interest claim, the Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s statutory right to interest on delayed payment. The Court intervened, directing the Respondents to pay interest at 5% from the date of the application, citing the petitioner&#039;s statutory entitlement and legal precedents. The Court clarified that the non-adjudicatory nature of the order Annexure-N made it non-appealable and instructed the Respondents to settle the interest within three months without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>