<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46683</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner&#039;s appeal by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite finding the dismissal justified, the Court granted the petitioner another opportunity to reinstate the appeal by depositing the determined amount within two months. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46683</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner&#039;s appeal by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite finding the dismissal justified, the Court granted the petitioner another opportunity to reinstate the appeal by depositing the determined amount within two months. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>