<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1505 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463885</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that the surplus on redemption of treasury bills is taxable as capital gains, not interest, and sustained the CIT(A)&#039;s view. Several disallowances were set aside and deductions allowed: amount written off on leasehold land, 40% of royalty under s.80O, recurring software expenses as revenue, GDR issue expenses under s.35D, sale-leaseback, dies/moulds/jigs/fixtures, foreign travel, prior-period expenses, electricity connection charges, inter-corporate deposit write-offs, and penalty receipts treated as capital. Administrative-expense disallowance under Rule 8D was limited prospectively; interest attributable to exempt income was allowed where excess interest-free funds existed; wealth-tax paid was allowed; DEPB taxability was remanded for reconsideration; exclusions under s.80HHC (scrap/misc receipts) were directed to be made; AO&#039;s appeal under s.40(a)(i) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1505 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463885</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that the surplus on redemption of treasury bills is taxable as capital gains, not interest, and sustained the CIT(A)&#039;s view. Several disallowances were set aside and deductions allowed: amount written off on leasehold land, 40% of royalty under s.80O, recurring software expenses as revenue, GDR issue expenses under s.35D, sale-leaseback, dies/moulds/jigs/fixtures, foreign travel, prior-period expenses, electricity connection charges, inter-corporate deposit write-offs, and penalty receipts treated as capital. Administrative-expense disallowance under Rule 8D was limited prospectively; interest attributable to exempt income was allowed where excess interest-free funds existed; wealth-tax paid was allowed; DEPB taxability was remanded for reconsideration; exclusions under s.80HHC (scrap/misc receipts) were directed to be made; AO&#039;s appeal under s.40(a)(i) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>