<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1312 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463892</link>
    <description>Section 68 treatment of share capital and share allotment depends on the assessee&#039;s production of supporting documents and the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on the investors&#039; creditworthiness and genuineness. The Tribunal found that the relevant paper book and records had been placed before the Assessing Officer, that the subscribing entities were active companies, and that the investments came from their own resources. It also noted that addition had already been made in the hands of the subscribing company and that, for the relevant assessment year, the assessee was not required to prove the source of source. On that basis, no substantial question of law arose and the addition was not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1312 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463892</link>
      <description>Section 68 treatment of share capital and share allotment depends on the assessee&#039;s production of supporting documents and the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on the investors&#039; creditworthiness and genuineness. The Tribunal found that the relevant paper book and records had been placed before the Assessing Officer, that the subscribing entities were active companies, and that the investments came from their own resources. It also noted that addition had already been made in the hands of the subscribing company and that, for the relevant assessment year, the assessee was not required to prove the source of source. On that basis, no substantial question of law arose and the addition was not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>