<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1699 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463895</link>
    <description>The petition was not entertained on the merits, as the petitioner was relegated to the alternate statutory remedy of appeal against the assessment order. Liberty was preserved to seek interim relief before the appellate authority and to raise all contentions there, so the dispute was left to be determined in the appellate forum rather than in writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=852000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1699 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463895</link>
      <description>The petition was not entertained on the merits, as the petitioner was relegated to the alternate statutory remedy of appeal against the assessment order. Liberty was preserved to seek interim relief before the appellate authority and to raise all contentions there, so the dispute was left to be determined in the appellate forum rather than in writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>