https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463876 Delay condoned. Questions F, G and H held covered by a prior SC decision pronounced on 8 April 2009, which was decided in favor of the assessee and against the Department. As to Question I, the HC noted the Department did not argue the applicability of "miscellaneous income" under section 56 and therefore declined to examine that issue. The special leave petition is disposed of on those terms. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Sep 2025 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463876 Delay condoned. Questions F, G and H held covered by a prior SC decision pronounced on 8 April 2009, which was decided in favor of the assessee and against the Department. As to Question I, the HC noted the Department did not argue the applicability of "miscellaneous income" under section 56 and therefore declined to examine that issue. The special leave petition is disposed of on those terms. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463876