https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46676 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay ruled in favor of the petitioner, a Civil Construction Company, in a case concerning excisability of goods and the validity of a demand notice issued by the Collector of Central Excise. The Court held that the petitioner's activity did not amount to manufacturing excisable goods under the Central Excise Act, quashing the order and granting relief by allowing withdrawal of the deposited amount and releasing the Bank Guarantee. The Court also stayed the judgment for eight weeks, with no costs awarded in the case. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46676 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay ruled in favor of the petitioner, a Civil Construction Company, in a case concerning excisability of goods and the validity of a demand notice issued by the Collector of Central Excise. The Court held that the petitioner's activity did not amount to manufacturing excisable goods under the Central Excise Act, quashing the order and granting relief by allowing withdrawal of the deposited amount and releasing the Bank Guarantee. The Court also stayed the judgment for eight weeks, with no costs awarded in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46676