<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Enclosing imported genset into steel container with fittings creates &#039;Power Pack&#039; qualifying as manufacture under Section 2(f)(i), excise duty payable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92687</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the process of enclosing the imported genset in a steel container and integrating radiator, fan, filters, tank, pipes, pumps, valves and silencer effects a qualitative transformation such that a new, distinct and marketable commodity (the &quot;Power Pack&quot;) emerges. Applying the transformation and marketability tests, the Court found the final product possesses a different character, structure and functional utility (portability) from the imported genset, and is marketed to end customers. The activity therefore constitutes &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f)(i) of the Act, and the appellant is liable to pay excise duty on the goods manufactured.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Enclosing imported genset into steel container with fittings creates &#039;Power Pack&#039; qualifying as manufacture under Section 2(f)(i), excise duty payable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92687</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the process of enclosing the imported genset in a steel container and integrating radiator, fan, filters, tank, pipes, pumps, valves and silencer effects a qualitative transformation such that a new, distinct and marketable commodity (the &quot;Power Pack&quot;) emerges. Applying the transformation and marketability tests, the Court found the final product possesses a different character, structure and functional utility (portability) from the imported genset, and is marketed to end customers. The activity therefore constitutes &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f)(i) of the Act, and the appellant is liable to pay excise duty on the goods manufactured.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>