<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46673</link>
    <description>Penalty and debarment orders passed against directors were unsustainable where no separate show cause notice was issued to them and no opportunity of hearing was afforded before the adverse action. Because the proceedings carried serious penal consequences, compliance with the requirements of notice and hearing was essential. The orders were therefore liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46673</link>
      <description>Penalty and debarment orders passed against directors were unsustainable where no separate show cause notice was issued to them and no opportunity of hearing was afforded before the adverse action. Because the proceedings carried serious penal consequences, compliance with the requirements of notice and hearing was essential. The orders were therefore liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>