https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778665 SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the High Court's order remitting the advance ruling matter to the AAR under Section 98(4) of the CGST Act for fresh consideration of whether the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge and the applicability of exemption Serial No.18 of N/N.12/2007 Central Tax (Rate). The court left the petitioner's question of law open. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778665 SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the High Court's order remitting the advance ruling matter to the AAR under Section 98(4) of the CGST Act for fresh consideration of whether the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge and the applicability of exemption Serial No.18 of N/N.12/2007 Central Tax (Rate). The court left the petitioner's question of law open. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778665