<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1156 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778667</link>
    <description>Notification No. 20/2007-CE required a manufacturer seeking special rebate or rate to apply in writing to the Commissioner by 30 September of the relevant financial year, with only a further 30-day condonable period. No provision in the notification made an eligibility certificate a prerequisite for filing that application, and prior refund claims had been filed without waiting for such a certificate. A communication dated 14/05/2010 was treated only as an intimation of eligibility, not the required certificate. The application filed on 24/05/2010 was therefore beyond the prescribed time and was rightly rejected as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1156 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778667</link>
      <description>Notification No. 20/2007-CE required a manufacturer seeking special rebate or rate to apply in writing to the Commissioner by 30 September of the relevant financial year, with only a further 30-day condonable period. No provision in the notification made an eligibility certificate a prerequisite for filing that application, and prior refund claims had been filed without waiting for such a certificate. A communication dated 14/05/2010 was treated only as an intimation of eligibility, not the required certificate. The application filed on 24/05/2010 was therefore beyond the prescribed time and was rightly rejected as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>