https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778674 NCLAT (LB) held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the applications for limitation at the first hearing because the SC has ruled that stages under Sections 95 and 99 do not involve judicial adjudication. The appeals are allowed; the impugned orders in all three matters are set aside, the Section 95 applications are restored to their original numbers, and the matters are remanded to the Tribunal to be decided in accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 23.09.2025. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778674 NCLAT (LB) held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the applications for limitation at the first hearing because the SC has ruled that stages under Sections 95 and 99 do not involve judicial adjudication. The appeals are allowed; the impugned orders in all three matters are set aside, the Section 95 applications are restored to their original numbers, and the matters are remanded to the Tribunal to be decided in accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 23.09.2025. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778674