https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778677 NCLAT PB found a split decision between the Judicial and Technical Members regarding rights under the JVA and assignment deeds and held that the discrepancy warranted invocation of Section 419(5) and Rule 60(3). The interim order of 08.11.2023 was not uniformly treated by both members, so the appeal was disposed of by remand to the President of the NCLT to refer the matter to a third member for opinion on the correct view. Parties were directed to appear before the President on 7 October 2025. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778677 NCLAT PB found a split decision between the Judicial and Technical Members regarding rights under the JVA and assignment deeds and held that the discrepancy warranted invocation of Section 419(5) and Rule 60(3). The interim order of 08.11.2023 was not uniformly treated by both members, so the appeal was disposed of by remand to the President of the NCLT to refer the matter to a third member for opinion on the correct view. Parties were directed to appear before the President on 7 October 2025. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778677