<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778707</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition, holding the reassessment under sections 148A and 148 valid and rejecting the argument that the JAO lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings. The court found the issue foreclosed by existing precedent of the HC, therefore the challenge to the reopening of assessment failed and the reopening stood upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778707</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition, holding the reassessment under sections 148A and 148 valid and rejecting the argument that the JAO lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings. The court found the issue foreclosed by existing precedent of the HC, therefore the challenge to the reopening of assessment failed and the reopening stood upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>