<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1199 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778710</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition under section 68, finding that the provision cannot be invoked where share application money and share premium arise from investors whose identity, creditworthiness and genuineness were established by the assessee. The Court found no substantial question of law from the Tribunal&#039;s order and therefore ruled against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:38:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1199 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778710</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition under section 68, finding that the provision cannot be invoked where share application money and share premium arise from investors whose identity, creditworthiness and genuineness were established by the assessee. The Court found no substantial question of law from the Tribunal&#039;s order and therefore ruled against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>