<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46666</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail should not be sustained where the investigating agency was not given a reasonable opportunity to file objections before the application was decided. The Supreme Court held that the question of custodial interrogation could not properly be assessed without hearing the agency, and found that deciding the matter the very next day after service left no real chance to respond. The grant of anticipatory bail was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 22:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46666</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail should not be sustained where the investigating agency was not given a reasonable opportunity to file objections before the application was decided. The Supreme Court held that the question of custodial interrogation could not properly be assessed without hearing the agency, and found that deciding the matter the very next day after service left no real chance to respond. The grant of anticipatory bail was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>