<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1900 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463867</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was held unsustainable where no exempt income was earned during the relevant assessment years, because the statutory precondition for invoking section 14A did not arise. The CBDT circular relied upon by the Revenue could not override the Act or the Rules. On that basis, the deletion of the disallowance by the appellate authority was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1900 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463867</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was held unsustainable where no exempt income was earned during the relevant assessment years, because the statutory precondition for invoking section 14A did not arise. The CBDT circular relied upon by the Revenue could not override the Act or the Rules. On that basis, the deletion of the disallowance by the appellate authority was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>