<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1592 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463869</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed deduction u/s 35D for GDR-issue costs; permitted depreciation on a sale-and-leaseback; treated expenditure on dies, moulds, jigs and fixtures as revenue expenses; allowed proportionate premium on leasehold land; held travel by MD&#039;s spouse improperly disallowed by CIT(A) (revenue appeal allowed to restore disallowance); held no interest disallowance under r.8D where own funds exceed investment value; dismissed revenue&#039;s challenge under s.40(a)(i) for payments to non-resident suppliers; ruled redemption surplus on treasury bills is not capital gains; allowed wealth-tax payment; treated technical know-how fees as royalty eligible under s.80O; held process know-how acquisition to be capital expenditure; allowed buy-back related expenses as revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1592 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463869</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed deduction u/s 35D for GDR-issue costs; permitted depreciation on a sale-and-leaseback; treated expenditure on dies, moulds, jigs and fixtures as revenue expenses; allowed proportionate premium on leasehold land; held travel by MD&#039;s spouse improperly disallowed by CIT(A) (revenue appeal allowed to restore disallowance); held no interest disallowance under r.8D where own funds exceed investment value; dismissed revenue&#039;s challenge under s.40(a)(i) for payments to non-resident suppliers; ruled redemption surplus on treasury bills is not capital gains; allowed wealth-tax payment; treated technical know-how fees as royalty eligible under s.80O; held process know-how acquisition to be capital expenditure; allowed buy-back related expenses as revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>