<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46654</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders dated 24/25-9-2002 and 29-11-2002, and directed the Commissioner to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply filed on 27-9-2002 on merits. The court imposed a cost on the petitioner for any delaying tactics and instructed the Commissioner to decide the case strictly on its merits and in accordance with the law, uninfluenced by the court&#039;s observations in the writ.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46654</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders dated 24/25-9-2002 and 29-11-2002, and directed the Commissioner to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply filed on 27-9-2002 on merits. The court imposed a cost on the petitioner for any delaying tactics and instructed the Commissioner to decide the case strictly on its merits and in accordance with the law, uninfluenced by the court&#039;s observations in the writ.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>