<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1244 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463863</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice issued under section 148 after expiry of the limitation period was challenged, with the court directing that the matter be decided in accordance with law. The Assessing Officer was required to consider the precedent relied upon and the respondents&#039; stated position while disposing of the proceedings. The petition was therefore disposed of with directions, rather than on a substantive adjudication of the reassessment issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1244 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463863</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice issued under section 148 after expiry of the limitation period was challenged, with the court directing that the matter be decided in accordance with law. The Assessing Officer was required to consider the precedent relied upon and the respondents&#039; stated position while disposing of the proceedings. The petition was therefore disposed of with directions, rather than on a substantive adjudication of the reassessment issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>