<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1698 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463864</link>
    <description>HC held that the Section 148 notice dated 01.04.2022 reopening assessment for AY 2015-16 was time-barred, as notices for that year should have been issued on or before 31.03.2021. The impugned proceedings and consequential orders/notices issued after the limitation period were declared impermissible in law and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1698 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463864</link>
      <description>HC held that the Section 148 notice dated 01.04.2022 reopening assessment for AY 2015-16 was time-barred, as notices for that year should have been issued on or before 31.03.2021. The impugned proceedings and consequential orders/notices issued after the limitation period were declared impermissible in law and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>