https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46653 A tribunal order cannot be applied against a party whose factual case was not substantively considered; the proper course is to set aside the order for that party and remit the matter for fresh consideration. An unregistered subsequent assignment of a trade mark does not by itself defeat entitlement to a notified excise benefit where the assignment itself is undisputed and the substantive basis for using the brand is established. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46653 A tribunal order cannot be applied against a party whose factual case was not substantively considered; the proper course is to set aside the order for that party and remit the matter for fresh consideration. An unregistered subsequent assignment of a trade mark does not by itself defeat entitlement to a notified excise benefit where the assignment itself is undisputed and the substantive basis for using the brand is established. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46653