https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46649 The High Court held jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions related to lead acid battery imports. It emphasized the nexus with the aggrieved party's place of business. While alternative remedies were available, writ jurisdiction was not barred. The Designated Authority's final findings were deemed valid as they were based on new information. The Court ruled that the preliminary de-minimis determination did not preclude further investigation. Disclosure issues were to be addressed by statutory authorities. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies. Time for appeal was extended, interim orders vacated, and no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46649 The High Court held jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions related to lead acid battery imports. It emphasized the nexus with the aggrieved party's place of business. While alternative remedies were available, writ jurisdiction was not barred. The Designated Authority's final findings were deemed valid as they were based on new information. The Court ruled that the preliminary de-minimis determination did not preclude further investigation. Disclosure issues were to be addressed by statutory authorities. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies. Time for appeal was extended, interim orders vacated, and no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46649