<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Admission of Section 7 application upheld as documentary records prove Rs 50,00,000 financial debt and limitation extended under Section 18</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92651</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld admission of the Section 7 application. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence that the sum of Rs. 50,00,000 constituted a financial debt advanced for time value of money, supported by TDS entries, 26AS records, matching ledger entries and acknowledgment in the CD&#039;s balance sheet dated 31.03.2017. The adjudicating authority correctly held that the first demand arose 04.04.2016, and the balance-sheet acknowledgment within the limitation period extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, permitting filing within time. A written agreement was not prerequisite; documentary evidence established debt and default. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Admission of Section 7 application upheld as documentary records prove Rs 50,00,000 financial debt and limitation extended under Section 18</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92651</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld admission of the Section 7 application. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence that the sum of Rs. 50,00,000 constituted a financial debt advanced for time value of money, supported by TDS entries, 26AS records, matching ledger entries and acknowledgment in the CD&#039;s balance sheet dated 31.03.2017. The adjudicating authority correctly held that the first demand arose 04.04.2016, and the balance-sheet acknowledgment within the limitation period extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, permitting filing within time. A written agreement was not prerequisite; documentary evidence established debt and default. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>