<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1086 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778597</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi - AT held that the sub-agents are the recipients of services rendered by the appellant, permitting recovery of service tax from the sub-agents. The Tribunal applied its prior Riya Travels precedent and found Section 73A(2) of the Finance Act inapplicable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed, confirming levy of service tax on the sub-agents rather than on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1086 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778597</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi - AT held that the sub-agents are the recipients of services rendered by the appellant, permitting recovery of service tax from the sub-agents. The Tribunal applied its prior Riya Travels precedent and found Section 73A(2) of the Finance Act inapplicable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed, confirming levy of service tax on the sub-agents rather than on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>