<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1092 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778603</link>
    <description>A Section 9 insolvency application is not maintainable where correspondence and surrounding facts show a pre-existing dispute before the demand notice, including a dispute over entitlement to rent. The Tribunal noted that the dispute had been raised before the Adjudicating Authority but wrongly rejected, making admission of the application unsustainable. It also recorded a settlement filed by both sides under which the dues were to be discharged, and the proceedings were no longer required to continue. The admission was therefore set aside and the Section 9 proceedings were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1092 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778603</link>
      <description>A Section 9 insolvency application is not maintainable where correspondence and surrounding facts show a pre-existing dispute before the demand notice, including a dispute over entitlement to rent. The Tribunal noted that the dispute had been raised before the Adjudicating Authority but wrongly rejected, making admission of the application unsustainable. It also recorded a settlement filed by both sides under which the dues were to be discharged, and the proceedings were no longer required to continue. The admission was therefore set aside and the Section 9 proceedings were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>