<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778618</link>
    <description>HC held that the Supreme Court&#039;s subsequent authoritative ruling resolved the &quot;proper officer&quot; question under Section 28 of the Customs Act by recognizing DRI officials as proper officers. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, the appeals were restored to their original positions before the CESTAT for adjudication on merits, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778618</link>
      <description>HC held that the Supreme Court&#039;s subsequent authoritative ruling resolved the &quot;proper officer&quot; question under Section 28 of the Customs Act by recognizing DRI officials as proper officers. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, the appeals were restored to their original positions before the CESTAT for adjudication on merits, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>