<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1118 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778629</link>
    <description>ITAT, Ahmedabad held that rejection of an application for registration under s.80G(5) due to inadvertent wrong clause selection in Form 10AB was not maintainable. The Bench remitted the matter to the file of the CIT(E) with a direction to treat the application as if filed under clause (iii) to the second proviso to s.80G(5) and to grant approval if the applicant is otherwise eligible. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1118 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778629</link>
      <description>ITAT, Ahmedabad held that rejection of an application for registration under s.80G(5) due to inadvertent wrong clause selection in Form 10AB was not maintainable. The Bench remitted the matter to the file of the CIT(E) with a direction to treat the application as if filed under clause (iii) to the second proviso to s.80G(5) and to grant approval if the applicant is otherwise eligible. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>