<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1133 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778644</link>
    <description>HC held the reopening under s.148 was invalid because the reasons in the s.148A(b) notice had already been considered in the original assessment and the AO cannot review his own assessment by initiating reassessment. The court affirmed that reassessment proceedings cannot be used to reexamine documents or revisit the earlier stand taken by the AO. Petition was allowed and reassessment proceedings quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1133 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778644</link>
      <description>HC held the reopening under s.148 was invalid because the reasons in the s.148A(b) notice had already been considered in the original assessment and the AO cannot review his own assessment by initiating reassessment. The court affirmed that reassessment proceedings cannot be used to reexamine documents or revisit the earlier stand taken by the AO. Petition was allowed and reassessment proceedings quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>