<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778648</link>
    <description>HC held that advertisement, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses do not constitute an international transaction and therefore cannot be separately benchmarked for transfer pricing purposes. Applying the Court&#039;s prior decision in related appeals, the HC directed deletion of the AMP adjustment made by the tax authority. The ruling requires that such AMP costs not be treated as distinct cross-border transactions for separate transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778648</link>
      <description>HC held that advertisement, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses do not constitute an international transaction and therefore cannot be separately benchmarked for transfer pricing purposes. Applying the Court&#039;s prior decision in related appeals, the HC directed deletion of the AMP adjustment made by the tax authority. The ruling requires that such AMP costs not be treated as distinct cross-border transactions for separate transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>