<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778654</link>
    <description>HC directed cancellation of the GST registration of the proprietary concern effective 1 July 2020, finding the sole ground was non-filing of returns for six continuous months and noting the proprietor&#039;s death proven by a death certificate. The court held that retrospective cancellation beyond 1 July 2020 could not be imposed because the show-cause notice did not specify retrospective effect. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778654</link>
      <description>HC directed cancellation of the GST registration of the proprietary concern effective 1 July 2020, finding the sole ground was non-filing of returns for six continuous months and noting the proprietor&#039;s death proven by a death certificate. The court held that retrospective cancellation beyond 1 July 2020 could not be imposed because the show-cause notice did not specify retrospective effect. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>