<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1147 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778658</link>
    <description>HC set aside the attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account, holding that the statutory period under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act had lapsed. The petitioner is free to operate the bank account. The bank manager must give effect to this order without awaiting any further communication from the DGGI. The petition is disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1147 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778658</link>
      <description>HC set aside the attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account, holding that the statutory period under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act had lapsed. The petitioner is free to operate the bank account. The bank manager must give effect to this order without awaiting any further communication from the DGGI. The petition is disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>