<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46638</link>
    <description>A beneficial settlement scheme with a clear cut-off date could not be extended to a declarant who filed after the prescribed deadline. The Court held that waiver of interest was unavailable because the petitioner&#039;s declaration was admittedly late and therefore outside the scheme. Parity with another assessee also failed, since that case had complied with the scheme conditions and was not a valid basis for identical relief. The Court further noted the petitioner&#039;s prior unsuccessful proceedings and non-compliance with directions on interest payment, making Article 226 relief inappropriate on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46638</link>
      <description>A beneficial settlement scheme with a clear cut-off date could not be extended to a declarant who filed after the prescribed deadline. The Court held that waiver of interest was unavailable because the petitioner&#039;s declaration was admittedly late and therefore outside the scheme. Parity with another assessee also failed, since that case had complied with the scheme conditions and was not a valid basis for identical relief. The Court further noted the petitioner&#039;s prior unsuccessful proceedings and non-compliance with directions on interest payment, making Article 226 relief inappropriate on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>