<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1311 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463851</link>
    <description>A challenge to a nominated arbitrator based on his earlier role in a matter involving the same parties and the same arbitration did not survive once the arbitrator withdrew from the arbitral proceedings. The withdrawal removed the cause that was being pursued, so there was no remaining issue for adjudication. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 20:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1311 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463851</link>
      <description>A challenge to a nominated arbitrator based on his earlier role in a matter involving the same parties and the same arbitration did not survive once the arbitrator withdrew from the arbitral proceedings. The withdrawal removed the cause that was being pursued, so there was no remaining issue for adjudication. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>